Sunday, May 11, 2014

Learning Styles

        With respect to the relationship between learning styles and strategy preferences, motivation, personality type, academic discipline, and learning environment research has explored several hypotheses. First, when comparing more and less effective learners, what was found is that there were differences between the overall learning style of more effective and less effective learners; that is, the dominant style of the more effective language learners was communicative whereas that of the less effective language learners was authority-oriented. Second, learners with different perceptual learning style preferences demonstrated different lexical inferencing ability; learners with certain perceptual learning style preferences benefited more from the explicit instruction. Third, with respect to academic discipline, Art students displayed a tendency to emphasize a more divergent and assimilative learning preference than science students, who displayed a preference for convergent learning style and had systematically lower scores on phonology and semantics. Fourth, as for the learning environment, Blumberg and Auld (2010) found that 73% of learners preferred to take traditional learning courses, while only 25% preferred hybrid and 2% preferred online courses. Fifth, there were significant relationships between language learning strategy and the introverted/extroverted personality type; extroverted students used compensation, cognitive, memory, affective, and social strategies more than did introverted students

           A successful teacher functions a variety of teaching styles and strategies when teaching. This was not always the case when I learned English as a foreign language. Teachers were traditional and tended to feed the learners with forms and structures rather than eliciting the target language. The teaching methods also were conventional as teachers preferred talking almost all the time. This approach diminished the student’s talking time compared to the teacher’s talking time. The curricula, in turn, focused more on the structure than on conversation and speaking tasks; the textbooks never had an audio CD. That traditional teaching environment did not help me learn the language effectively because I was an audio and a visual learner. I could have learned more effectively and successfully through conversational interactions and watching visual target language than from a textbook. However, I was intrinsically motivated and I knew very well that the classroom should not be the only means of learning the language. Therefore, I tried learning the language through a diversity of resources, especially these that suit my learning style such as reading books in the target language, watching movies and listening to the news. I managed to learn the language as a result of motivation and attitude.  It is vital that the teachers use a diversity of teaching styles so that learners with different learning styles and strategies have the opportunity to learn more effectively.

3 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think it's great that despite the fact that you did not have the type of instruction you needed/wanted that you sought out others ways to learn the language outside of the classroom. My perception is that too many students rely too heavily on in-class instruction to learn a language (or any subject). That puts a lot of pressure on teachers across the board and it is unrealistic. I think real learning happens when students also take responsibility/initiative and seek many ways to gain knowledge both inside and outside of classrooms.

    P.S. I made a mistake and had to edit this comment for corrections and that's why I erased it and reposted. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey man, gives us more examples of the CELTA approach.

    ReplyDelete